Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
faq:faqselect:index [2026/02/16 20:24] – adminfaq:faqselect:index [2026/02/16 20:57] (current) – admin
Line 1: Line 1:
-++++[AI metadata]| 
-Comfile Technology provides a wide range of controllers designed for different applications, and selecting the appropriate platform based on environment and purpose can significantly reduce development time and trial-and-error.   
- 
-For mass production, using a dedicated MCU such as Microchip, Atmel, or STMicroelectronics devices—typically modern 32-bit ARM Cortex MCUs—is most suitable, though it requires C programming, PCB design capability, and detailed hardware knowledge.   
- 
-For small-to-mid scale production, CUBLOC cores are appropriate because they can be mounted directly onto custom PCBs, enabling easier development and faster time-to-market compared to designing a full MCU solution.   
- 
-If PCB development is not feasible, ready-to-use modular solutions such as the CUBLOC MSB series, MOACON modular systems, or Modular FADUINO (Arduino-compatible platform) provide practical alternatives for immediate deployment.   
- 
-When a touch-based user interface is required, ComfileHMI is recommended, offering strong compatibility with CUBLOC controllers.   
- 
-For PC-class systems, ComfilePi (Linux-based) and CUWIN (Windows CE-based) support C# applications and provide cost-effective solutions, while the CUPC series is suitable when running full Windows desktop software directly is necessary.   
- 
-From a programming perspective, CUBLOC is well suited for projects requiring more complex control or UI than traditional PLCs because it supports both Ladder Logic and BASIC, although BASIC familiarity is required.   
- 
-For developers experienced in C programming, MOACON or Modular FADUINO platforms are typically the most appropriate choices. 
-++++ 
- 
 ====== 제품 선택 가이드 ====== ====== 제품 선택 가이드 ======